106 years of heritage to give way to casinos

Biloxi ushers in post-Katrina economy with a billion-dollar casino
Casino compacts blocked Democrats halt 22,000 new slot machines

Casino compacts go bust

Casino to add new features Poker room to move to Half Dome Theatre; cantina to open

Delayed casino is finally moving in right direction

Helping hand or handful Mohegan say their take small, Kenosha casino would help needy tribe

Long odds - The good news Casino gambling is struggling again in Ohio

R.I. slot parlors join anti-casino fight

Residents surveyed on casino Indian tribe won't give specific results, says people in Canal Fulton lack knowledge of plan

Say no to Initiative 1 and casino gambling

State says casino petition comparison faulty

Topinka proposes new education plan financed by casino gambling

Tribe losing time in fight for casinos

Woman found OK just south of casino


State says casino petition comparison faulty

LINCOLN -- A judge ignored the plain meaning of the Nebraska Constitution when she ruled that a casino gambling petition could appear on the November ballot, attorneys for the state said Tuesday.

Attorney General Jon Bruning's office filed a legal brief with the Nebraska Supreme Court arguing that Lancaster County District Judge Karen Flowers erred in her Aug. 17 ruling.

At issue is whether the petition backed by Boyd Gaming of Las Vegas violates the Nebraska Constitution's ban on resubmitting proposals within three years.

According to the brief, Flowers incorrectly focused on differences between gambling proposals defeated by voters in 2004 and this year's petition.

Instead, the brief said, she should have concluded that the "essential substance" of both was to legalize casino gambling in Nebraska.

Flowers said the earlier proposals would have authorized two casinos and thousands of gambling devices outside of casinos, while this year's measures would authorize only three casinos.

"If this were all that was required to avoid the effect of the resubmission clause, it could easily be circumvented by placing the essence of defeated measures into 'new' measures containing other provisions," the state said.

Bruning has appealed Flowers' decision to the Nebraska Supreme Court. Both sides will present arguments at a hearing set for Sept. 8.